[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       trac
Subject:    Re: [Trac] Unsupported version control system "svn", Trac broken between [11050] and [11125]
From:       Emmanuel Blot <manu.blot () gmail ! com>
Date:       2012-07-18 9:04:11
Message-ID: CAERKKH1uUwnL+9mO8CSq1YFp17P2gE0-m2RqvXad3Fu5f0=95g () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> I tend to agree with this, but it has one drawback: currently, when we
> programmatically rewrite trac.ini, we throw away comments and
> formatting. But maybe that's not really a problem.

IIRC this also happends whenever the conf file is updated through the
administration panel, right?
I guess that if the existing config file is backed up, it is less
intrusive to ditch comments than to leave Trac upgrade with a
non-functional installation…

Cheers,
Manu.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]