[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       tproxy
Subject:    Re: [tproxy] tproxy4 future
From:       KOVACS Krisztian <hidden () sch ! bme ! hu>
Date:       2007-09-18 13:40:23
Message-ID: 20070918134022.GC16553 () sch ! bme ! hu
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi,

On k, szept 18, 2007 at 03:22:37 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> >REDIRECT needs NAT. And you can't implement "intercepting" traffic without
> >some kind of redirection. So it's required for squid & co.
> 
> Right, except that I do not use REDIRECT actually, but let the clients
> directly (and knowingly) connect to proxy:3128. Whee :)

Yep you're right, but that's a completely different scenario. You don't
need the TPROXY target in that case.

-- 
KOVACS Krisztian

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]