[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       gnupg-users
Subject:    Re: [liberationtech] [tor-talk] BitMail.sf.net v 0.6 - Secure Encrypting Email Client
From:       adrelanos <adrelanos () riseup ! net>
Date:       2013-11-17 0:38:34
Message-ID: 5288100A.3070400 () riseup ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

I am not in contact with bitmail in any way, I wouldn't use it myself
because I find the communication about bitmail very poor, namely no
responses to points raised by others. Anyway, I like to comment on a few
things raised here.

Ulex Europae:
> Robert'
> should upload his binaries to Github.

No one can host binaries on github at the moment. They deprecated that
service.

> Along with his source code. Then,
> if the MD5 checksum on his compiled binaries matches the MD5 checksum
> on the source code when it is compiled independently, he's golden.

Sure.

> That
> is how that works, how it is supposed to work.

This should be our ideal, but we're far from it, very few software
packages support this.

> Accept no substitutes.

I don't think that's possible at the moment. There are no
deterministically built operating systems yet.

_______________________________________________
Gnupg-users mailing list
Gnupg-users@gnupg.org
http://lists.gnupg.org/mailman/listinfo/gnupg-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]