[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       tor-talk
Subject:    Re: Ubuntu Privacy Remix 10.04r1 out
From:       Ted Smith <teddks () gmail ! com>
Date:       2010-10-19 2:36:42
Message-ID: 1287455802.15425.12.camel () anglachel
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 03:54 -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake Eugen Leitl (eugen@leitl.org):
> 
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 02:44:59PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
> > > Thus spake Eugen Leitl (eugen@leitl.org):
> > > 
> > > > https://www.privacy-cd.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=66&Itemid=89
> > > 
> > > https://www.privacy-cd.org/en/no-network
> > > 
> > > I suppose that's one way to address the problem of the network
> > > adversary... Sure looks like this means this post has nothing to do
> > > with Tor, though.
> > 
> > Yes, it doesn't have to do with Tor directly, should have
> > pointed that out. However, there's at least some overlap
> > between Tor users and higher paranoia-level folks, and the 
> > environment is complementary to Tor in that regard.
> 
> There may be some overlap, but all of those people are doing it wrong.
> 

You can't really say that they're doing it wrong. They're just doing it
right to the point of not really doing much of anything. Security is all
about a balance of doing it wrong versus doing it right in a way that
allows you to do stuff. Apparently, UPR's users can do stuff, or at
least I assume they can if they use UPR.

["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talk    in the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]