[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       tor-talk
Subject:    Re: filesharing with tor and offsystem online storage
From:       "Michael Schmidt" <schmidtm524 () googlemail ! com>
Date:       2008-01-21 12:38:14
Message-ID: 5cc93d950801210438m29e71520tba20b0fe67afd45 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Robert, see the update with source and (first) makefile-description here:
http://offsystem.sourceforge.net/download.html

On Jan 20, 2008 8:05 PM, Robert Hogan <robert@roberthogan.net> wrote:

> On Sunday 20 January 2008 18:19:30 Michael Schmidt wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> >
> > source is here:
> > http://offsystem.cvs.sourceforge.net/offsystem/?sortdir=down
> >
> > On Jan 20, 2008 7:05 PM, Robert Hogan <robert@roberthogan.net> wrote:
> > > There don't appear to be any source tarballs and looking at the cvs
> > > repository
> > > only the project members could possibly know how to put the many
> modules
> > > together.
>
> Yes, that's the cvs repository I was referring to above - there are no
> tags
> there and no source tarballs anywhere else. This means that there is no
> source distribution for any of their releases. That's annoying.
>
> I'm guessing that off_network is the main module there but why should I
> bother
> reverse-engineering their build process just to install a possibly broken
> cvs
> version? I want the latest release. It's their funeral at the end of the
> day
> but an open-source project that doesn't release source tarballs is just
> being
> silly.
>

[Attachment #3 (text/html)]

Hi Robert, see the update with source and (first) makefile-description here: <a \
href="http://offsystem.sourceforge.net/download.html">http://offsystem.sourceforge.net/download.html</a><br><br><div \
class="gmail_quote">On Jan 20, 2008 8:05 PM, Robert Hogan &lt; <a \
href="mailto:robert@roberthogan.net">robert@roberthogan.net</a>&gt; \
wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, \
204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div> <div \
class="Wj3C7c">On Sunday 20 January 2008 18:19:30 Michael Schmidt wrote:<br>&gt; Hi \
Robert,<br>&gt;<br>&gt; source is here:<br>&gt; <a \
href="http://offsystem.cvs.sourceforge.net/offsystem/?sortdir=down" target="_blank"> \
http://offsystem.cvs.sourceforge.net/offsystem/?sortdir=down</a><br>&gt;<br>&gt; On \
Jan 20, 2008 7:05 PM, Robert Hogan &lt;<a \
href="mailto:robert@roberthogan.net">robert@roberthogan.net</a>&gt; wrote:<br>&gt; \
&gt; There don&#39;t appear to be any source tarballs and looking at the cvs <br>&gt; \
&gt; repository<br>&gt; &gt; only the project members could possibly know how to put \
the many modules<br>&gt; &gt; together.<br><br></div></div>Yes, that&#39;s the cvs \
repository I was referring to above - there are no tags <br>there and no source \
tarballs anywhere else. This means that there is no<br>source distribution for any of \
their releases. That&#39;s annoying.<br><br>I&#39;m guessing that off_network is the \
main module there but why should I bother <br>reverse-engineering their build process \
just to install a possibly broken cvs<br>version? I want the latest release. It&#39;s \
their funeral at the end of the day<br>but an open-source project that doesn&#39;t \
release source tarballs is just being <br>silly.<br></blockquote></div><br>



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]