[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       tor-talk
Subject:    Re: storage privacy (was: Nice quiet, private, anonymous life??)
From:       "F. Fox" <kitsune.or () gmail ! com>
Date:       2007-12-03 1:54:40
Message-ID: 475361E0.3020208 () gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

coderman wrote:
> apologies in advance for veering this far off topic...
> 
> On Dec 2, 2007 2:25 PM, F. Fox <kitsune.or@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [ strange, dangerous, and likely to fail methods for destroying drives ]
> 
> use full disk encryption, even the latest ubuntu supports this.
> 
> destroy the disk keys and you've got platters full of entropy.
> 
> anything else is just a bad idea.
> 
(snip)

I don't think much of the aforementioned physical "destruction" methods;
I also agree in that full disk encryption is the best way to go, if at
all possible.

However, given that a system has already been deployed without such
encryption, wouldn't secure overwriting be a reasonable way of
destroying such data?

It'd be slow, and maybe not effective against the most determined (and
well-funded) attackers - but at least it wouldn't be dangerous, weird,
and violent... =:oD

- --
F. Fox
CompTIA A+, Net+, Security+
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHU2HfbgkxCAzYBCMRAj0dAJ92NHfJqZVVcK/u99gbWTo0jsSnFACeOSJW
EmV8OG+cGBSMlWBGXfqvh1M=
=hc2d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]