[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       tor-talk
Subject:    Re: Surveillance rules, feature suggestion
From:       Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl ! org>
Date:       2007-11-25 17:32:52
Message-ID: 20071125173252.GU4005 () leitl ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 05:18:52PM +0000, Smuggler wrote:

> The reason why to do this is that those nodes would not provide relaying
> to the "public" and thus imho not fall under the various EU Data

How would you argument in court that middleman nodes don't offer 
services to the public? 

> retention rules.

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic