[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: tor-talk
Subject: Re: Surveillance rules, feature suggestion
From: Eugen Leitl <eugen () leitl ! org>
Date: 2007-11-25 17:32:52
Message-ID: 20071125173252.GU4005 () leitl ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 05:18:52PM +0000, Smuggler wrote:
> The reason why to do this is that those nodes would not provide relaying
> to the "public" and thus imho not fall under the various EU Data
How would you argument in court that middleman nodes don't offer
services to the public?
> retention rules.
--
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic