[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       tor-dev
Subject:    [tor-dev] onionbalance useful on same server / for high-spec non-location hidden servers?
From:       Patrick Schleizer <patrick-mailinglists () whonix ! org>
Date:       2020-06-03 9:24:22
Message-ID: 39f07124-4d09-a59b-90fb-8744bd51ec1c () whonix ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Would it be useful to run multiple Tor instances and onionbalance on the
very same server? Or does that totally defeat the purpose of onionbalance?

In my case, it's not a location hidden service. Just an alternative way
to connect to a server which is available over clearnet anyhow.

I guess the presumption of onionbalance is that a location hidden server
shouldn't produce too much Tor traffic as that would be suspicious?

Is a single Tor client a bottleneck? I.e. are multiple Tor clients more
performant than only one Tor client? Does onionbalance "only" work
around limitations of individual servers in CPU / IO / bandwidth?

In other words, assume CPU / IO / bandwidth is "unlimited" on one
server. (And ignore failover.) Does it make sense to run multiple Tor
instances and onionbalance or would a single Tor instance without
onionbalance be sufficient?

Cheers,
Patrick
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic