[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: tmda-workers
Subject: Re: whitelist on Reply-To:
From: Jim Ramsay <i.am () jimramsay ! com>
Date: 2004-07-14 17:07:36
Message-ID: cd3p8p$eoo$1 () sea ! gmane ! org
[Download RAW message or body]
Tim Rice wrote:
>
> TMDA 1.0.3/sendmail
>
> I discovered that if I sent an e-mail from an account that was not
> whitelisted but the Reply-To: header was my address that is whitelisted,
> the message gets delivered unchallenged.
>
> Is this the intended behavior?
I didn't think so, but a read of the code shows me that it is.
Basically, it looks like when a message comes in TMDA checks the
following addresses against your incoming filter in this order:
- The envelope sender
- The X-Primary-Address: header
- The From: header
- The Reply-To: header
As soon as even one of these match, the action specified by the filter
is carried out.
--
Jim Ramsay
"Me fail English? That's unpossible!"
_________________________________________________
tmda-workers mailing list (tmda-workers@tmda.net)
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-workers
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic