[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: tmda-users
Subject: Re: TMDA
From: Mark Horn <mark () hornclan ! com>
Date: 2005-02-18 20:20:45
Message-ID: slrnd1cjmh.ft3.mark () home ! hornclan ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
On 2005-02-18, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> Thomas A. Moulton wrote:
>> So no matter what we do we will still send out UCE to the unsuspecting user
>> who had their email address spoofed and we can't detect when that happens.
>>
>> Until we get an irrate message from them or a spamcop report
>>
>> At that price... maybe SA is enough... what does TMDA buy me?
>
> You can always validate inbound email against SPF.
You can also implement greylisting (1) at your server. This will
also help prevent joe-jobbing abuse of C/R systems, because most
spammers use bulk mailers that can't deal with temp fail deliveries,
where as real email gets delivered through an MTA that handles
queueing.
(1) http://www.greylisting.org
_____________________________________________
tmda-users mailing list (tmda-users@tmda.net)
http://tmda.net/lists/listinfo/tmda-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic