[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       tmda-users
Subject:    Re: Bouncing vs. auto respond
From:       "Jason R. Mastaler" <jason-dated-992374829.c04077 () mastaler ! com>
Date:       2001-06-04 19:40:29
[Download RAW message or body]

"Ted Rathkopf" <ted-dated-992210100.5fe7d3@rathkopf.org> writes:

> In other words, there was no way for the bounce messages to get out.
> 
> I ended up hacking qmail-send to put in a non-null sender on bounce
> messages.  I didn't realize that this violated RFCs.  If anybody can
> come up with a solution that DOESN'T violate RFCs I'd love to hear
> it.  And switch ISPs isn't an option.

TMDA isn't an MTA and therefore won't violate any RFCs when generating
a "bounce" message with a non-null envelope sender.  I will make the
envelope sender for "bounces" user-configurable with <> as the default.

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]