[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       theora
Subject:    [theora] NHW 0.2.3 version - visual performance
From:       Raphael Canut <nhwcodec () gmail ! com>
Date:       2022-09-18 16:42:13
Message-ID: CAKE58qHDs8RLOMFSarPWY+b_TufGrFh=9RPFB3z8e4AM3CBRGg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Hello,

Just a message as I have visually evaluated this weekend the last 0.2.3
version of NHW (mainly on "good quality neat" images), because I little
rushed to publish the 0.2.3 version without correctly visually testing it,
and in fact I am really satisfied with the level of neatness reached
now.Neatness is really the "innovative" aspect I want to put forward with
NHW, and this new version could start to be convincing... I also started to
work a couple months ago on a full-neatness version or a -neatness-boost
switch, I have even more neatness level but the problem for now is that it
also oversharpens the image which on the other hand visually hurts a
little... So for now the latest 0.2.3 version has the most correct and good
neatness, and it would be really great if some of you could reconsider
NHW.As fewer and fewer people seem to follow my work, I wanted to let you
know that if you tested NHW 2-3 years ago and was not convinced, hope you
could give a second chance at the 0.2.3 version because for me it starts to
be interesting... -but really don't know if the industry for example will
change its mind...-

Also quickly as I previously said, the biggest challenge now for NHW is
maybe to design a post-processing filter that will remove aliasing from NHW
images, actually I have seen that anti-aliasing processings exist, I have
notably read that anti-aliasing could be used in super-resolution, if
someone could point me some documentation on this, it would be great!

Any feedback/opinion on the new 0.2.3 version is very welcome!

Cheers,
Raphael

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr"><div>Hello,</div>
<br>
Just a message as I have visually evaluated this weekend the last 0.2.3 
version of NHW (mainly on &quot;good quality neat&quot; images), because I little 
rushed to publish the 0.2.3 version without correctly visually testing 
it, and in fact I am really satisfied with the level of neatness reached
 now.Neatness is really the &quot;innovative&quot; aspect I want to put forward 
with NHW, and this new version could start to be convincing... I also 
started to work a couple months ago on a full-neatness version or a 
-neatness-boost switch, I have even more neatness level but the problem 
for now is that it also oversharpens the image which on the other hand 
visually hurts a little... So for now the latest 0.2.3 version has the 
most correct and good neatness, and it would be really great if some of 
you could reconsider NHW.As fewer and fewer people seem to follow my 
work, I wanted to let you know that if you tested NHW 2-3 years ago and 
was not convinced, hope you could give a second chance at the 0.2.3 
version because for me it starts to be interesting... -but really don&#39;t 
know if the industry for example will change its mind...-<br>
<br>
Also quickly as I previously said, the biggest challenge now for NHW is 
maybe to design a post-processing filter that will remove aliasing from 
NHW images, actually I have seen that anti-aliasing processings exist, I
 have notably read that anti-aliasing could be used in super-resolution,
 if someone could point me some documentation on this, it would be 
great!<br>
<br>
Any feedback/opinion on the new 0.2.3 version is very welcome!<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Raphael
		

</div>


_______________________________________________
theora mailing list
theora@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]