[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       theora
Subject:    Re: [theora] Theora/Thusnelda features questions.
From:       Patrick Aljord <patcito () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-07-24 1:47:54
Message-ID: 6b6419750907231847x7b3f74acr2ac5334460a50cb7 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Ralph Giles<giles@xiph.org> wrote:
> Yes, those could be fixed with a format revision. However, if you're
> going to go to the pain of upgrading everyone's decoder, why not use
> dirac? Or fix a whole bunch of other infelicities, less obvious to the
> untrained eye, and build a whole new codec? We've had this debate both
> ways several times. :)
>

Wouldn't starting a new code takes years though? Given how many years
it took to get theora 1.0 and it wasn't even a new codec. I'm asking
cause I'm curious by the way, not to critic :)
_______________________________________________
theora mailing list
theora@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]