[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       theora
Subject:    Re: [theora] Re: [dyne:bolic] Concerning the (correct) use of Theora
From:       "Patrick Aljord" <patcito () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-01-23 5:17:25
Message-ID: 6b6419750801222117w535c9d88o4a9d0e84219ae0b8 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Jan 23, 2008 5:34 AM, Ivo Emanuel Gonçalves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey, I merely (mis-)quoted Monty's demo paper on thusnelda.  Gotta
> tell the people the good news.
>  It turns out it is realistic to say Theora will compete with H.264.
>

I remember too that paper from Monty saying that thusnelda will
achieve equal or superior quality with h.264 and how h.264 is based on
an old format too (MPEG) just like theora on vp3.
It would great, I mean interesting, to have an 'official'
clarification on this. Monty? :)
_______________________________________________
theora mailing list
theora@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/theora

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]