[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       taskjuggler-devel
Subject:    Re: [taskjuggler-devel] karm integration?
From:       Dick Kniep <dick () kniep ! nl>
Date:       2004-06-03 14:52:11
Message-ID: 200406031652.11370.dick () kniep ! nl
[Download RAW message or body]

On Thursday 03 June 2004 14:27, Mark Bucciarelli schreef:
> I would imagine that task juggler would need to lock the file for it's
> entire processing.  Once done, any apps connected to it would be signaled
> that the file had changed and they would update their displays.

How would you know which applications to signal?

>
> I don't see why this wouldn't work for multi-user access.  It's much easier
> than writing a server and is also easier to install and use.

You could be right here, however there should always be some control on the 
execution of TJ, because you could get weird results if more than one person 
requests TJ to plan.

Needs more thinking thru anyway

>
> [BTW -- Currently, Karm does not take advantage of this nice
> functionality--it rather stupidly locks the file on open and holds that
> lock until it closes.  But this will change ...]
>
> And if the order of how things are written to the file is important, this
> seems like it could (should?) be implemented in the resource layer.

Cheers,
Dick

-- 
To unsubscribe, email: taskjuggler-devel-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, email: taskjuggler-devel-help@suse.com

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]