[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       taglibs-dev
Subject:    RE: Creating a set of Nuance grammars
From:       Rahul P Akolkar <akolkar () us ! ibm ! com>
Date:       2005-05-06 5:55:02
Message-ID: OF877068E3.98AF39E7-ON85256FF9.002012D8-85256FF9.002080FA () us ! ibm ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

--=_alternative 002080F785256FF9_=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"

On 5/5/05, Steve Hodson <SHodson@voxgen.com> wrote:
<snip/>
> All of this is in no way a problem for RDC - it's more little things to 
bear in mind when creating the Nuance compliant grammars.  If it is ok I 
could post more as I find them.
> 

Sure, that would be nice. I will initiate the RDC wiki in a day or two, 
and FAQs and platform subtleties will probably form the first two pages. 
Using the wiki, all of us who are active here can chip in.

> Sorry Daniel I didn't get back to you sooner but while I think 
converting the existing grammars would be very beneficial I've been asked 
to create a <record> RDC-like tag [something along the lines of please 
leave a message, blah, you said blah, would you like to save this message, 
message saved].  This is proving to be quite a challenge and certainly a 
good introduction to the RDCs.
> 
> :)
<snip/>

You have, I'm quite certain, looked at this [ 
http://www.w3.org/TR/voicexml20/#dml2.3.6 ]. Couple that with this 
conversation you had with Mitch about the fsm* tags [ 
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=taglibs-dev&m=111054119013351&w=2 ] and 
I'd say you have a decent starting point. For the record RDC, I'd bypass 
nbest, canonicalization and validation.

Have fun :)

-Rahul

--=_alternative 002080F785256FF9_=--
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]