[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sylpheed
Subject:    [sylpheed:23448] Re: Dspam
From:       Roger Lindmark <roger.lindmark () bredband ! net>
Date:       2004-10-08 15:06:40
Message-ID: 20041008170640.2a3adfc1.roger.lindmark () bredband ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

På Thu, 7 Oct 2004 20:12:11 -0400
Feisal Mohammed <feisal@uwi.tt> skrev:

> For what it's worth, I've managed to incorporate the
> DSpam library into Sylpheed, with minor changes.  Now
> My spam gets automatically diverted into a junk folder.
> I also have actions which allow me to identify spam (which was missed)
> in the inbox and also to identify false positives in the junk folder.
> This is just working now and I have several things hard-coded
> (like the name of the junk folder).
> I tried Thunderbird after using Sylpheed for over a year, just because
> of the spam detection but missed the fast, clean interface that
> Sylpheed has, so now Sylpheed can classify spam.  Thunderbird users
> eat your heart out!
> 
> As of this writing, I've just started to train it and already it
> has correctly identified 3 spams with no false-positives so far.
> 
> Using: Sylpeed 0.9.12 and Dspam 3.0.0 libraries

I have not tested Dspam yet. First I used SpamAssassin, which was tricky
to set up and also was extremely slow on my P200MMX. 

Now I use POPFile that is much faster and much better. It's accuracy is
at present 99.71 %. I am very pleased with it and can recommend it.

Sincerely yours

Roger



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]