[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: sylpheed
Subject: [sylpheed:22710] Re: Dealing with Microsoft's concept of RFCs...
From: Fred Ruffet <fred.ruffet () free ! fr>
Date: 2004-04-16 8:09:55
Message-ID: 1082102995.407f94d3832cd () imp1-q ! free ! fr
[Download RAW message or body]
Selon Bill Thompson <Billt@Mahagonny.com>:
> I have had the same issues, however I decided to stick with the in-line
> signature. If anyone complains about the signature, I take it as an
> opportunity to explain why PGP is a very good thing and why OE is very
> bad.
You're right, and it's not an overhead of discussion, cause I already have to
explain people what is this atachement they can't open.
A good way of having people to understand use of PGP, is to telnet on port 25
of your favorite unsecured sendmail server, and to send the person a mail with
its own mail address. He will understand what "signing" means (And he will also
understand that viruses doesn't come with address of infested person...)
--
Fred Ruffet - fred.ruffet@free.fr
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic