[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sylpheed
Subject:    [sylpheed:22616] Re: Feature request
From:       "James K. Lowden" <jklowden () schemamania ! org>
Date:       2004-03-28 0:04:24
Message-ID: 20040327190424.77456d8c.jklowden () schemamania ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, James Gibbon <james.gibbon@virgin.net>
wrote:
>> If a message is highlighted, then mark as read and mark as unread
>> should be available.  If a folder is highlighted, mark all as read
>> should be available.

> Again, although implemented in a slightly different way than you suggest
> it seems to be there, and just as easy - right click on message, mark /
> mark all read.

It would be more intuitive and in keeping with OO principles to have "mark
all messages" and "select all [messages]" be a a folder-level choice,
since it's a folder-level action.  

I have on occasion misinterpreted "select all" in the message window as a
shortcut for Edit->"Select all".  

--jkl



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

Configure | About | News | Add a list | Sponsored by KoreLogic