[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sylpheed
Subject:    [sylpheed:15670] Re: Getting GPGME to be recognized in 0.8.0 during ./configure --enable-gpgme
From:       Melvin Hadasht <melvin.hadasht () free ! fr>
Date:       2002-08-29 14:10:12
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Ryan,

on Wed, 28 Aug 2002 21:25:29 -0400
Ryan Emge <emger@norwich.edu> wrote:

 > 
 > To All,
 > 
 > I'm trying to get sylpheed version 0.8.0 to recognize GPGME at ./configure
process with the string "./configure --enable-gpgme" in which I have GPGME
version 0.3.6 installed currently. Could someone please help me get sylpheed to
recognize it? each time I run it, it never seems to find it. Thanks.
 > 
 > ----
 > checking whether to use GPGME... yes
 > checking for gpgme-config... (cached) /usr/local/bin/gpgme-config
                                 ^^^^^^
                                 ^^^^^^
 > checking for GPGME - version >= 0.2.3... 
 > *** 'gpgme-config --version' returned 0.3.6, but GPGME (0.3.9) was found!
 > *** If gpgme-config was correct, then it is best to remove the old
 > *** version of GPGME.  You may also be able to fix the error
 > *** by modifying your LD_LIBRARY_PATH enviroment variable, or by editing
 > *** /etc/ld.so.conf.  Make sure you have run ldconfig if that is
 > *** required on your system.
 > *** If gpgme-config was wrong, set the environment variable GPGME_CONFIG
 > *** to point to the correct copy of gpgme-config, 
 > *** and remove the file config.cache before re-running configure
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You don't say if you tried what the configure script proposed.

>From what it says, it looks like you have two different versions, isn't it?
Did you check if this is true? Did you remove the obsolete one?

Did you also "remove the file config.cache before re-running configure" ? It
seems that you forgot this.  "Same player, shoot again" :) and please remove
your Reply-To: (there is no need to fill in the Reply-To header if it is the
same as the From: header, unless you demand people to post the answers only to
you, even if it your post was on a ML).

Vi ses senere (Danish: See you later)


-- 
Melvin Hadasht
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]