[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       svk-devel
Subject:    [svk-devel] Re: svk pull: individual revisions, attributed to
From:       warlord () MIT ! EDU (Derek Atkins)
Date:       2006-08-23 15:17:21
Message-ID: 20060823151711.ctbnjng8amdcwcs8 () webmail ! mit ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]

Quoting David Glasser <glasser@MIT.EDU>:

> On 8/23/06, Derek Atkins <warlord@mit.edu> wrote:
>> What if $CWD is a WC?  Will
>>
>>   svk pull
>>
>> be a 1:1 sync, 1:1 smerge, and then update?  Or... a 1:1 sync, lump smerge,
>> and then update?  Or a lump sync, lump smerge, and update?
>
> "svk pull" is shorthand for "svk pull .", so that's lump smerge
> followed by update. (I don't think anything in svk does a "lump sync"
> other than "svk sync" with an explicit --skipto argument.)

OH!  I bet that's part of my problems on my local branch!   I really wish
there were a way to turn that off.   Does "svk push" do the same thing?

> --dave

-derek

-- 
       Derek Atkins, SB '93 MIT EE, SM '95 MIT Media Laboratory
       Member, MIT Student Information Processing Board  (SIPB)
       URL: http://web.mit.edu/warlord/    PP-ASEL-IA     N1NWH
       warlord@MIT.EDU                        PGP key available

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]