[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       svk-devel
Subject:    [svk-devel] Re: "svk info" latency vs. vc-svk.el: pain vs. gain
From:       glasser () mit ! edu (David Glasser)
Date:       2006-08-08 15:30:47
Message-ID: 1ea387f60608081230kae05ecaw5d94576d825711c2 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On 8/8/06, Chip Salzenberg <chip@pobox.com> wrote:
> Fixed, thanks.  Working on the vc-svk.el integration now.
>
> BTW, is there enough information available via the SVN interface you're
> using to implement the full vc-status ("modified", "added", "deleted")?
> I'm not asking you to do it, just asking whether I -can- do it.

That info doesn't come from SVN since we don't use SVN's working
copies. The lines about '.schedule' should hopefully do something like
usefulness.

--dave

-- 
David Glasser | glasser@mit.edu | http://www.davidglasser.net/

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]