[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       suse-kde
Subject:    Re: [opensuse-kde] Adding liquidshell to KDE:Extra
From:       Klaas Freitag <freitag () opensuse ! org>
Date:       2019-06-08 19:40:08
Message-ID: 04506172-3c1c-892f-7a4d-65016bca933a () opensuse ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

Am 08.06.19 um 21:30 schrieb Luca Beltrame:
> In data sabato 8 giugno 2019 17:56:53 CEST, Martin Koller ha scritto:
> 
>> ok, then please suggest a wording which makes clear that one can use
>> liquidshell instead of plasmashell, please.
> 
> "A Qt5 based desktop shell"?
> Hmm, why is it important that it is Qt5 based? Why not saying what is
(supposed to be) cool about it:

"A simple yet powerful desktop shell that comes with limited hardware
requirements - the raising star of tomorrows desktops"... or so. (The
last part is optional ;-)

I might not be deep enough in here, but why is the topic so frosty?
Wasn't this all about choice, and collaboration also on alternatives? I
love to read technical discussions why Muh is better than Meh but there
was some different tune here.

Klaas
-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail: opensuse-kde+unsubscribe@opensuse.org
To contact the owner, e-mail: opensuse-kde+owner@opensuse.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]