[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       suse-kde
Subject:    Re: [suse-kde] Reading kmail-mails from console?
From:       Craig Ambrose <craig () hurstbridge ! org ! au>
Date:       2004-02-27 23:17:18
Message-ID: 200402281017.18995.craig () hurstbridge ! org ! au
[Download RAW message or body]


Hi Arvid

I'm quite fond of Pine, but this is very subjective. I don't think that you'll 
find it to feel terribly 'integrated in the shell' (I'm not even entirely 
sure what you mean by that) but when I first used it at uni I was very 
pleased to discover a console based mail program that is in fact self 
explanatory and easy to use (unlike elm). Of course, being easy to use and 
being efficient to use are not usually the same thing.

Craig

On Saturday 28 February 2004 2:53 am, Arvid Johansson wrote:
> Then I'll ask a follow up question...
>
> Which mailer?
>
> I can tell right now I don't want to use mutt if I can avoid it. I haven't
> tried pine or mail as Patrick suggested but I have a feeling neither of
> them are as nimble as nmh. What I really liked about nmh was that it felt
> integrated in the shell. On a debian system I have used mailx a little. It
> worked good enough, but as I can remember it only used the mbox format.
>
> I realize this is just a question about taste, but perhaps I can get some
> useful hints anyway.
>
> Arvid
 

-- 
To unsubscribe, email: suse-kde-unsubscribe@suse.com
For additional commands, email: suse-kde-help@suse.com
Please do not cross-post to suse-linux-e


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]