[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       subversion-issues
Subject:    [Issue 4374]  authz will deny recursive access if a rule exists for a path even if the path doesn't
From:       danielsh () tigris ! org
Date:       2013-06-17 12:40:14
Message-ID: 20130617124014.9BE2E540054 () sc157-tigr ! sjc ! collab ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4374






------- Additional comments from danielsh@tigris.org Mon Jun 17 05:40:14 -0700 2013 -------
That's actually the right thing to do if 'baz' existed in any _prior_ revision
of /foo/bar.  I agree it'd be reasonable to allow the copy if /foo/bar never had
a 'baz' child in any revision.  (Whether that means "/foo/bar/baz@N is ENOENT
for all N" or "[/foo/bar@HEAD -r N]/baz is ENOENT for all N" is a good question.)

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=463&dsMessageId=3058267

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [issues-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org].
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]