[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       subversion-issues
Subject:    Re: [Issue 3235] 'log -g' merge determination logic faulty
From:       "Paul Burba" <ptburba () gmail ! com>
Date:       2008-07-22 14:11:11
Message-ID: 6cfe18eb0807220711l13ed2854g45207bb0ebea7074 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 9:47 AM,  <cmpilato@tigris.org> wrote:
> http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3235
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------- Additional comments from cmpilato@tigris.org Tue Jul 22 06:47:59 -0700 2008 -------
> Paul, sometimes I get lost in your annotated play-by-play issue posts (my fault;
> not yours).  If the grand summary of your newfound concerns is, "svn log -g
> seems to treat reverse merges the same way as forward merges", then yes, this is
> known and (I think) by design.  Ideally, we'd have some different indication --
> "Reverse-merged via:" or something -- but we currently do not.  If this is
> believed to be a problem, please open a new issue for it.

Sorry Mike,

Mark disabused me of my misunderstanding on dev.  I was caught up in
reviewing the r32142, r32187 group and started to see problems where
there were none :-(

Also, I didn't update my issue page before submitting
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3235#desc8 so it
"crossed in the mail".  Regardless, there still seems to be a real
problem in desc8.  I can enter a new issue, but leaving it in "'log
-g' merge determination logic faulty" seems logical.

> If, however, no such clean summary exists for what you were saying, could you
> try in 200 words or less to summarize?  :-)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@subversion.tigris.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]