[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: subversion-issues
Subject: [Issue 472] New - "svn up" fails if too much svndiff data received
From: issues () subversion ! tigris ! org
Date: 2001-08-31 0:20:45
[Download RAW message or body]
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=472
*** shadow/issues_15/472 Thu Aug 30 17:20:45 2001
--- shadow/issues_15/472.tmp.16647 Thu Aug 30 17:20:45 2001
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,31 ----
+ +============================================================================+
+ | "svn up" fails if too much svndiff data received |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ | Issue #: 472 Component: subversion |
+ | Status: NEW Version: current |
+ | Resolution: Platform: All |
+ | Issue type: DEFECT OS/Version: All |
+ | Priority: P1 Subcomponent: src |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ | Assigned To: issues@subversion.tigris.org |
+ | Reported By: kfogel@tigris.org |
+ | CC list: Cc: |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ | Milestone: TargetMilestone: --- |
+ | URL: |
+ +============================================================================+
+ | DESCRIPTION |
+ Suppose you have a working copy at revision 866, and the repos is now at
+ revision 1000 (i.e., a typical mass-commit scenario). If you try to
+ update from the top of your working copy, it will fail. Neon complains
+ "unable to read chunked response". If you go down to a subdir and update
+ one file at a time, or a small subdir at a time, the updates will succeed.
+ If you do enough of these, then you'll eventually be able to finish off
+ the update by updating from a higher directory, because now there will
+ be much less svndiff data coming down the pike (at least, that's our
+ conjecture as to the reason, but the symptoms point to a firm correlation
+ between amount of diff data and likelihood of update failure).
+
+ This is, just barely, not an M3 bug. People can do their updates in
+ pieces for a while, if necessary. But it will be painful, hence the
+ P1 priority.
\ No newline at end of file
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic