[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       subversion-dev
Subject:    pristinefulness and svn:needs-lock
From:       Daniel Shahaf <d.s () daniel ! shahaf ! name>
Date:       2022-01-31 11:57:58
Message-ID: 20220131115758.GA14771 () tarpaulin ! shahaf ! local2
[Download RAW message or body]

The main use-case for pristineless files is large, undiffable,
undeltifiable files checked out from a box in the next rack unit over
(= wide/cheap uplink and downlink).

Undiffable files will likely have svn:needs-lock on them, won't they?

Is there a correlation between "has svn:needs-lock" and "doesn't need
its pristine"?  Does either of them imply the other (at least in most
cases)?

Should svn:needs-lock files that aren't locked have pristines (by
default)?  This could be viewed as a backwards-incompatible change, so
assume the user has opted in to new behaviour.
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]