[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       subversion-dev
Subject:    Re: Semantics of svn_wc_is_adm_dir(), and interaction with bindings
From:       Mark Phippard <markp () softlanding ! com>
Date:       2005-10-28 23:18:12
Message-ID: OF7C02337B.E08BD224-ON852570A8.0080025E-852570A8.00800268 () softlanding ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

> Mark, do you think this is still necessary?

I was not following this thread.  Is the question just whether the API
ought to take a full path like C:\project\.svn or just a folder name like
.svn?  If so, then I think the latter is fine.  As you said, it is trivial
to obtain this value from a full path.

I still cannot envision the scenario where I will need this function in
Subclipse anyway.  We do very little directly with the WC.   We are mostly
calling library functions and these details are buried in there.

Mark


_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email \
Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.  \
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]