[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       subversion-dev
Subject:    book changes vs other doc changes
From:       kfogel () collab ! net
Date:       2003-12-30 20:35:36
Message-ID: 200312302035.hBUKZaZ22677 () newton ! ch ! collab ! net
[Download RAW message or body]

This was from an IRC Conversation today, thought maybe it should be
forwarded here:

kfogel>    dionisos: I don't think a general policy of "doc changes
           don't need votes" is good.  If they're so trivial, they
           should be easy to review, so what the heck, let's review
           them.

           The book is a bit different, in that the authors are a)
           striving to keep a consistent authorial voice, and b) doing
           large batches of work at a sitting, making the diffs
           sometimes non-trivial.

           That's why I think it's okay to treat book differently from
           other docs. 

fitz>      kfogel: AFAIK, if the book compiles, the plan is to merge
           the whole damned thing into the 1.0 branch

kfogel>    Also, they know they're getting published as treeware, so
           they're being careful to vet the master copy.

fitz>      yes

dionisos>  ok. either way is fine by me.

fitz>      what he said  [* fitz points at kfogel]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]