[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       subversion-dev
Subject:    Re: annotate vs blame
From:       "Hamilton Link" <helink () sandia ! gov>
Date:       2002-08-30 15:27:52
[Download RAW message or body]

Brandon Ehle wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >More stew - 'svn linehistory'. It's not too nice or short, it carries
> >a reference to "lines" even though some day we are not line-based at
> >all, and so on. But it does carry a significant advantage over
> >everything else I've seen.
> >
> >It gives me the idea that I _will_ indeed see who changed what line
> >and when - none of the other choices have yet done that.
> >
> >Maybe this could be worked on a bit more?
> >
> >
> This sounds like the one!  Just make an alias for "svn lh" even us lazy
> farts can live with it.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

+1 for linehistory and lh, IMO.

I had no idea what annotate or blame did (or blame, etiology, whodunit,
stratify, or anything else) until this email, now it's obvious. For
binary files I can even pretend lh stands for localhistory.

hl


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]