[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       subversion-dev
Subject:    Re: Feature request: Keyword $Rev$ with a twist
From:       Branko Čibej <brane () xbc ! nu>
Date:       2002-07-31 22:13:42
[Download RAW message or body]

Josef Wolf wrote:

>Having used CVS for about 10 years now, I still have no clue why you
>all want those mixed-revs-stuff. Maybe someone could give me a good
>use case?
>  
>

Oh my, that's a good one. CVS has mixed-revision working copies, too. 
When you "cvs commit", only your changes get sent to the server; your 
sandbox isn't updated to HEAD.

As to use cases: When I say "svn ci", I don't want my working copy 
changed. If I want that, I say "svn up". It's as simple as that.

-- 
Brane Čibej   <brane@xbc.nu>   http://www.xbc.nu/brane/


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]