[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       subclipse-users
Subject:    Re: [Subclipse-users] Any advice for tuning subclipse performance
From:       Mark Phippard <markphip () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-05-22 19:32:54
Message-ID: ff892c5d0905221232x42b20d78of8989fc0b5371601 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Joseph Kesselman <keshlam@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> Subversion/Subclipse is working pretty reliably for me on Red Hat
> Linux... but I'm working with large projects, and checking
> out/updating/committing really is tremendously slower than equivalent
> transfers in and out of CVS. It looks like part of the problem is that
> there's a large amount of overhead for every file touched; CVS appears
> to be avoiding those delays and maintaining far higher network throughput.
>
> Is there anything I could try tweaking, either in Subclipse/Eclipse or
> at the system level, which might make this more responsive?

Have you tried these things using the svn command line for comparison?
 We can never be anywhere near as fast as it is, but that at least
establishes a baseline.  If you think the command line is slow too, as
an example, there isn't anything that can be done in Subclipse to
speed it up.

During the actual commit/update almost all code is happening in the
SVN libraries (same as command line).  Usually the delays that would
happen would be at the end of the process when we have Eclipse refresh
changed resources, which fires builders, updates caches and resource
listeners etc.

-- 
Thanks

Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/

------------------------------------------------------
http://subclipse.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1047&dsMessageId=2353036

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe@subclipse.tigris.org].
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]