[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       struts-dev
Subject:    =?iso-8859-1?q?=5BApache_Struts_Wiki=5D_Updated=3A__EddieBush?=
From:       dev () struts ! apache ! org
Date:       2004-10-31 7:10:00
Message-ID: 20041031071000.55813.65934 () minotaur ! apache ! org
[Download RAW message or body]

   Date: 2004-10-31T00:10:00
   Editor: EddieBush <ekbush@apache.org>
   Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki
   Page: EddieBush
   URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/EddieBush

   no comment

Change Log:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 
 * [http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31230 31230] - Multiple classes \
using deprecated DefinitionsUtil class - Patch to DefinitionDispatcherAction could be \
considered, and the rest tabled for 1.3.  
-* [http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31501 31501] - html:form focus \
generates non-XHTML - Could be invalid  +* \
'''[http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31501 31501]''' - html:form \
focus generates non-XHTML - Could be invalid   
 * [http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31642 31642] - <bean:include> \
always include Session id (if any) even for external Urls (href attribute) - Patch \
could be considered   
@@ -42,20 +42,7 @@
 * [http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31827 31827] - Bug in \
validation part - Could be a support issue  
 = Thought-Holder =
-== Follow-up to Ted's Post ==
-
-Are there any glaring inconsistencies in the posted documents with the Tomcat \
                release philosophy?
-
-== Release Thoughts ==
-
-So ... according to the release plan we're over-due a vote?  Actually, that's \
getting the cart before the horse, isn't it?  What about bugzilla?  We still need to \
address that, don't we?  Most everything there is an enhancement.  There are a few \
                issues, but, IMHO, nothing we're going to solve before this release \
                gets cut.
-
-Are there any show stoppers for anyone?
-May we proceed to defer outstanding issues to 1.2.6?  ... or are we moving on to \
1.3?  I need to look at the roadmap I suppose an get a feel for what our current \
                direction is.
-
-In any case, it seems to me bugzilla has yet to be dealt with and needs to be.  From \
there, as I understand it, there should be a build made that we all test as \
thoroughly as we can - and vote on.  I agree with your earlier statement about not \
voting +1 unless you have the utmost confidence in the build from having \
battle-tested it, that is, provided quorum may be reached with those who can't \
battle-test abstaining from the vote.  In the end, however, it's up to each of us to \
                vote our conscience, regardless of whether or not we can battle-test.
-
-If that's unintelligible, I claim sleep-deprivation! :-)
 
+(Empty)
 ----
 CategoryHomepage

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]