[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       struts-dev
Subject:    Re: Struts-faces
From:       Michael Rassmussen <razmaspaz () gmail ! com>
Date:       2004-07-06 2:09:30
Message-ID: 1d0ae860407051909104ba654 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I can look at this tomorrow night.  I am guessing it is a dependency
against the new validator.  Since the nightly moved to 1.1.3 and
validator doesn't have deprecated methods in it.  Craig just chimed in
and said that faces should compile against 1.1 and 1.2., but without
knowing the nuances of the commons-validator roadmap I can't say if
this is going to be possible without some major refactoring of faces.

On Mon, 5 Jul 2004 19:26:25 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf
<mailings@matthias-wessendorf.de> wrote:
> Yes Ted
> you are right.
> 
> michael patched it via
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29448
> there was also a disscussion on the dev-list.
> 
> my wrapper is also using HttpServletRequest of servlet-2.3,
> but nightly-builds are empty.
> 
> so now i am on the point of my first mail
> (this thread) :-)
> 
> regards,
> Matthias
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Ted Husted [mailto:husted@apache.org]
> > Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 7:03 PM
> > To: Struts Developers List
> > Subject: RE: Struts-faces
> >
> >
> > I believe that Michael Rasmussen submitted a patch so that
> > Struts Faces would compile with 1.2.x, and it also required
> > Servlet 2.3 only.
> >
> > -Ted.
> >
> > On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 17:39:38 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > > i think it will be better (perhaps for now)
> > > to compile against servlet 2.3
> > >
> > > jsf-deployment-guide tells people howto run jsf (the RI) in 1.3 or
> > > 1.4-j2ee-containers.
> > >
> > > so if struts-faces is build against 2.4
> > > people run into problems, when they *must*
> > > use 1.3-webcontainer (e.g. tomcat)
> > >
> > > on my box struts-faces from cvs (incl. patch for 2.3) runs
> > in tomcat5
> > > with RI and MyFaces.
> > >
> > > so, i don't know the complexity of changing
> > > on nightly-build-box the dependency from 2.4
> > > to 2.3
> > >
> > > btw. there is another dependency in struts-faces
> > > it builds against struts1.1
> > > with 1.2 there is a problem too... (it is a known issue)
> > > FormComponent.java has a problem with method
> > > "createDynaActionFormClass()" of class "DynaActionFormClass"
> > >
> > > Matthias
> > >
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Ted Husted [mailto:husted@apache.org]
> > >> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 5:17 PM
> > >> To: Struts Developers List
> > >> Subject: RE: Struts-faces
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to
> > make sure
> > >> it stays in synch with Tomcat 5.
> > >>
> > >> But, the question is whether we want to mandate that
> > Struts-Faces can
> > >> only compile against 2.3 (and not 2.4)? Or vice-versa. Or
> > is there a
> > >> way to write the class so it compiles under either?
> > >>
> > >> I know this is a pain. We went through the same problem with
> > >> DataSources between 2.2 and 2.3. I'm not sure what the
> > issue here is,
> > >> but for DataSources, the interface changed and we had to
> > stub the new
> > >> members so that they threw exceptions if called. Of course, the
> > >> problem with that approach is it may obviate new functionality or
> > >> rely on deprecated methods.
> > >>
> > >> -Ted.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:14:02 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> James,
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> i also guess it is the result of the commitment. i submitted
> > >>> (first) a wrapper, that builds against 2.4
> > >>>
> > >> reason is, the
> > >>> build-porperties had *default* to 2.4
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> okay ted asks for a 2.3-wrapper, so i created that candidate.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> i think the wrapper should compile against 2.3
> > >>> since jsf is able to run in j2ee1.3-containers
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> So i am wondering, why struts-faces uses 2.4
> > >>> for compiling.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> btw. the 2.3 wrapper runs on servlet2.4-containers (like
> > >>> tomcat5.0)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Matthias
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>> I think it is happening because of the changes I committed
> > >>>>
> > >> for your
> > >>>> fix for MyFaces.  If you look at when the builds stopped,
> > >>>>
> > >> it's right
> > >>>> after I made the commits on 6/29.  It must be an issue of what
> > >>>> version of servlet.jar that the
> > HttpServletRequestWrapper class is
> > >>>> being compiled against. Is it not possible to make that class
> > >>>> compilable against both 2.3 and 2.4?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -James
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>>> From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:mailings@matthias-
> > >>>>
> > >> wessendorf.de]
> > >>>> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 6:29 AM To: dev@struts.apache.org
> > >>>> Subject: Struts-faces
> > >>>>
> > >>>> see http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-
> > >>>> struts/nightly/struts- faces/
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> the nightly build is empty again,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> so is there a logfile, where i can check, why it is not build
> > >>>> successful?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers,
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --
> > >>>> Matthias Weßendorf
> > >>>> Aechterhoek 18
> > >>>> DE-48282 Emsdetten
> > >>>> Germany
> > >>>> Email: matthias AT wessendorf DOT net
> > >>>> URL: http://www.wessendorf.net
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> ---- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
> > unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-
> > >>>> mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>>> ---- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
> > unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > >>>> For additional commands, e-
> > >>>> mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> ---- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev- unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> > >> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> > > additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> >
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]