[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       struts-dev
Subject:    RE: Struts-faces
From:       Ted Husted <husted () apache ! org>
Date:       2004-07-05 17:03:27
Message-ID: 20047513327.333350 () LAPTOP4
[Download RAW message or body]

I believe that Michael Rasmussen submitted a patch so that Struts Faces would compile with 1.2.x, and it also required Servlet 2.3 only. 

-Ted.

On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 17:39:38 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> i think it will be better (perhaps for now)
> to compile against servlet 2.3
>
> jsf-deployment-guide tells people howto run jsf (the RI) in 1.3 or
> 1.4-j2ee-containers.
>
> so if struts-faces is build against 2.4
> people run into problems, when they *must*
> use 1.3-webcontainer (e.g. tomcat)
>
> on my box struts-faces from cvs (incl. patch for 2.3) runs in
> tomcat5 with RI and MyFaces.
>
> so, i don't know the complexity of changing
> on nightly-build-box the dependency from 2.4
> to 2.3
>
> btw. there is another dependency in struts-faces
> it builds against struts1.1
> with 1.2 there is a problem too... (it is a known issue)
> FormComponent.java has a problem with method
> "createDynaActionFormClass()" of class "DynaActionFormClass"
>
> Matthias
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ted Husted [mailto:husted@apache.org]
>> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 5:17 PM
>> To: Struts Developers List
>> Subject: RE: Struts-faces
>>
>>
>> I imagine Craig has Struts-Faces compiling against 2.4 to make
>> sure it stays in synch with Tomcat 5.
>>
>> But, the question is whether we want to mandate that Struts-Faces
>> can only compile against 2.3 (and not 2.4)? Or vice-versa. Or is
>> there a way to write the class so it compiles under either?
>>
>> I know this is a pain. We went through the same problem with
>> DataSources between 2.2 and 2.3. I'm not sure what the issue here
>> is, but for DataSources, the interface changed and we had to stub
>> the new members so that they threw exceptions if called. Of
>> course, the problem with that approach is it may obviate new
>> functionality or rely on deprecated methods.
>>
>> -Ted.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 05 Jul 2004 14:14:02 +0200, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
>>
>>> James,
>>>
>>>
>>> i also guess it is the result of the commitment. i submitted
>>> (first) a wrapper, that builds against 2.4
>>>
>> reason is, the
>>> build-porperties had *default* to 2.4
>>>
>>>
>>> okay ted asks for a 2.3-wrapper, so i created that candidate.
>>>
>>>
>>> i think the wrapper should compile against 2.3
>>> since jsf is able to run in j2ee1.3-containers
>>>
>>>
>>> So i am wondering, why struts-faces uses 2.4
>>> for compiling.
>>>
>>>
>>> btw. the 2.3 wrapper runs on servlet2.4-containers (like
>>> tomcat5.0)
>>>
>>>
>>> Matthias
>>>
>>>
>>>> I think it is happening because of the changes I committed
>>>>
>> for your
>>>> fix for MyFaces.  If you look at when the builds stopped,
>>>>
>> it's right
>>>> after I made the commits on 6/29.  It must be an issue of
>>>> what version of servlet.jar that the
>>>> HttpServletRequestWrapper class is being compiled against. Is
>>>> it not possible to make that class compilable against both
>>>> 2.3 and 2.4?
>>>>
>>>> -James
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Matthias Wessendorf [mailto:mailings@matthias-
>>>>
>> wessendorf.de]
>>>> Sent: Monday, July 05, 2004 6:29 AM To: dev@struts.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Struts-faces
>>>>
>>>> see http://cvs.apache.org/builds/jakarta-
>>>> struts/nightly/struts- faces/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> the nightly build is empty again,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> so is there a logfile, where i can check, why it is not build
>>>> successful?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Weßendorf
>>>> Aechterhoek 18
>>>> DE-48282 Emsdetten
>>>> Germany
>>>> Email: matthias AT wessendorf DOT net
>>>> URL: http://www.wessendorf.net
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ---- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
>>>> unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-
>>>> mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> ---- --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
>>>> unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-
>>>> mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> ---- - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-
>>> unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> dev-help@struts.apache.org
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
>> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]