[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       struts-dev
Subject:    Re: 2.3 for 1.3? (was Counting down to 1.2.1)
From:       Ted Husted <husted () apache ! org>
Date:       2004-04-07 23:17:45
Message-ID: 200447191745.388473 () LAPTOP4
[Download RAW message or body]

We're using the same "immutable" release scheme used by Apache HTTPD and Jakarta \
Tomcat. 

A release is rolled and assigned a number. If we judge the release good, it is \
promoted from alpha to beta to General Release. The release number never changes, \
only the rating we assign to it. 

1.2.0 never made it past alpha.

I think 1.2.1 may fare better. 

-Ted.

On Wed, 07 Apr 2004 14:03:03 -0400, dhay@lexmark.com wrote:
> 
> Is 1.2.1 just releasing as Beta?
> 
> 
> Also, what happened to 1.2.0?!
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> David
> 
> 
> > ---------+---------------------------->
> > > Ted Husted       |
> > > <husted@apache.or|
> > > g>               |
> > > > 
> > > 04/04/2004 09:14 |
> > > PM               |
> > > Please respond to|
> > > "Struts          |
> > > Developers List" |
> > > > 
> > ---------+---------------------------->
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------------------------------------------|
> > 
> > 
> > To:       Struts Developers List <struts-
> dev@jakarta.apache.org>                                        |
> > cc:
> > 
> > Subject:  2.3 for 1.3? (was Counting down to 1.2.1)
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---------------------------------------------|
> 
> 
> So, I'm going to knuckle down and do whatever we need to do to get
> 1.2.1 ready to cut this week.
> 
> In the meantime, I'm wondering if we want to just bite the bullet
> and move the minimum to servlet 2.3 for the Struts 1.3.x series?
> 
> People using 2.2 can still use 1.2.x, and having 2.3 available
> might simplify some of the configuration discussions we're having
> now.
> 
> Struts 2.0 is being slated for 2.4, so it's a clean continuum.
> 
> 
> As to the subproject reorg, I'd imagine we'd still keep taglib-
> classic on 2.2, and taglib-jstl and taglib-faces on 2.3.
> 
> -Ted.
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org
> 
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org For
> additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]