[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: strongswan-users
Subject: Re: [strongSwan] IKE SA's are getting deleted
From: vivek bairathi <bairathi.vivek () gmail ! com>
Date: 2010-08-03 8:31:18
Message-ID: AANLkTi=fOAPy73Zn7A5CT2xidR9C5s4HCRBfNkKntZ=W () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]
Hi All,
I got one issue resolved from the my problem mentioned in the mail below.
Actually only one IKE SA is getting created successfully and the other is
not. So, the SGW is sending IKE DELETE for both the IKE SA's.
But now a problem is coming that when I receive the delete for both the IKE
SA's then the IKE SA which was created successfully is not going down
completely as the SPD installed for it is not deleted and only the SAD
entries are deleted.
Q. Can you tell me is this a bug in the Strongswan IKEv2 stack?If yes, then
how to resolve it?Any clue, will also help.
Best Regards,
Vivek
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:33 AM, vivek bairathi <bairathi.vivek@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am facing a problem. The problem is as following:-
>
> When I am initiating an IKE SA from my Computer towards the Security
> Gateway (SGW). At the same time, SGW is also initiating an IKE SA for the
> same configuration. Both the IKE SA's are created successfully but as soon
> as both the SA's are created two IKE delete message comes from the SGW and
> both my SA's get deleted.
>
> Q. Can you tell me what can be the reason behind this?
> Q. Is it correct according to the IKEv2 Protocol?
>
> Regards,
> Vivek
>
>
>
[Attachment #5 (text/html)]
<div>Hi All,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I got one issue resolved from the my problem mentioned in the mail below.</div>
<div>Actually only one IKE SA is getting created successfully and the other is not. \
So, the SGW is sending IKE DELETE for both the IKE SA's. </div> <div> </div>
<div>But now a problem is coming that when I receive the delete for both the IKE \
SA's then the IKE SA which was created successfully is not going down completely \
as the SPD installed for it is not deleted and only the SAD entries are \
deleted.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Q. Can you tell me is this a bug in the Strongswan IKEv2 stack?If yes, then how \
to resolve it?Any clue, will also help.</div> <div> <br>Best Regards, </div>
<div>Vivek<br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 11:33 AM, vivek bairathi <span \
dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bairathi.vivek@gmail.com">bairathi.vivek@gmail.com</a>></span> \
wrote:<br> <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px \
0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid"> <div>Hi All,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I am facing a problem. The problem is as following:-</div>
<div> </div>
<div>When I am initiating an IKE SA from my Computer towards the Security Gateway \
(SGW). At the same time, SGW is also initiating an IKE SA for the same configuration. \
Both the IKE SA's are created successfully but as soon as both the SA's are \
created two IKE delete message comes from the SGW and both my SA's get \
deleted.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Q. Can you tell me what can be the reason behind this?</div>
<div>Q. Is it correct according to the IKEv2 Protocol?</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div>Vivek</div><font color="#888888">
<div> </div>
<div> </div></font></blockquote></div><br>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.strongswan.org
https://lists.strongswan.org/mailman/listinfo/users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic