[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       stringtemplate-interest
Subject:    [stringtemplate-interest] $r.st vs $r.template
From:       parrt () cs ! usfca ! edu (Terence Parr)
Date:       2005-11-26 15:16:55
Message-ID: 7BE7B2D5-03D9-46B7-896B-32348EB7AC0D () cs ! usfca ! edu
[Download RAW message or body]


On Nov 22, 2005, at 11:58 PM, VAUCHER Laurent wrote:

>> .st looks wrong but it is really long to type and believe me,
>> you'll use it in every rule...
>
>   I agree on that. .st does not look very nice, but we can get used
> to it the way lispers got used to CAR and CDR which do not mean
> anything anymore.
>
>   The only other possibility I see is using a special syntax. That
> would make it clear that it is not just any other attribute and
> that templates are part of ANTLR supported translation mechanism.
> The drawback, as always, is syntax-bloat.

Hi Laurent, thanks....I decided on .st :)

Thanks,
Ter

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]