[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
List: ssic-linux-users
Subject: RE: [SSI-users] Re: openSSI webView 0.1 released!
From: Karl Vogel <karl.vogel () seagha ! com>
Date: 2004-11-02 10:43:29
Message-ID: 6DED3619289CD311BCEB00508B8E133601A68F10 () nt-server2 ! antwerp ! seagha ! com
[Download RAW message or body]
> > One suggestion I have is to not separate the nodes into master and
> > slaves. A master/slave architecture implies that the master
> is a single
> > point of failure, which is not true in OpenSSI. It's better
> to call it
> > the "init node". I see you use this term in one of your
> detail views.
>
> I understand and agree with this.
> However, from my user point of view, the initnode still
> appears as a single
> point of failure, since if it crashes, all the cluster
> collapses. Even with
> redundant root filesystem (DRBD or shared SCSI), loosing init
> nodes will
> bring the whole cluster down. So, in my understanding, and
If you have shared disk hardware, the initnode can go down without
the whole cluster going down.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
Ssic-linux-users mailing list
Ssic-linux-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-users
[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]
Configure |
About |
News |
Add a list |
Sponsored by KoreLogic