> > One suggestion I have is to not separate the nodes into master and
> > slaves. A master/slave architecture implies that the master 
> is a single
> > point of failure, which is not true in OpenSSI. It's better 
> to call it
> > the "init node". I see you use this term in one of your 
> detail views.
> 
> I understand and agree with this. 
> However, from my user point of view, the initnode still 
> appears as a single 
> point of failure, since if it crashes, all the cluster 
> collapses. Even with 
> redundant root filesystem (DRBD or shared SCSI), loosing init 
> nodes will 
> bring the whole cluster down. So, in my understanding, and 

If you have shared disk hardware, the initnode can go down without
the whole cluster going down.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE
LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click
_______________________________________________
ssic-linux-devel mailing list
ssic-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ssic-linux-devel