[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sr-users
Subject:    Re: [SR-Users] sip over websockets sip uri
From:       Jade SZ <jitterbuffer () gmail ! com>
Date:       2017-02-28 10:33:44
Message-ID: CAP2a2YU9X8bi-5kupDfpP40tYmq609Jpxc3NXH+ExYPpcFrZ_Q () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/alternative)]


Horizontal scaling, that is what I am looking for webrtc over sip. Also by
giving 1 SIP URI to webrtc client.

Regarding - "Why not do UA -> kamailio 1 -> kamailio 2 or kamailio 3?"

Because I want the UA to be configured to wss which can load-balance to
multiple kamailio servers. Avoiding single point of failure.

Appreciate your help.

Any one else with more ideas?  Thanks

[Attachment #5 (text/html)]

<div dir="ltr">Horizontal scaling, that is what I am looking for webrtc over sip. \
Also by giving 1 SIP URI to webrtc client.<div><br></div><div>Regarding - &quot;<span \
style="font-size:12.8px">Why not do UA -&gt; kamailio 1 -&gt; kamailio 2 or kamailio \
3?</span>&quot;</div><div><br></div><div>Because I want the UA to be configured to \
wss which can load-balance to multiple kamailio servers. Avoiding single point of \
failure.</div><div><br></div><div>Appreciate your help.</div><div><br></div><div>Any \
one else with more ideas?   Thanks</div><br></div>


[Attachment #6 (text/plain)]

_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]