[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sr-dev
Subject:    Re: [sr-dev] ICE=force_relay tests between two baresips
From:       Richard Fuchs <rfuchs () sipwise ! com>
Date:       2014-04-30 13:33:20
Message-ID: 5360FBA0.3030605 () sipwise ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

[Attachment #2 (multipart/signed)]


On 04/30/14 00:45, Juha Heinanen wrote:
> Juha Heinanen writes:
> 
>> it thus looks like that when ICE=force_relay is given, also adding of
>> a=rtcp:<port> need to be prevented.
> 
> if a=rtcp:<port> did not exist in incoming sdp, there is no need for
> rtpengine to add it, because then, by default, rtcp port is one larger
> than rtp port.

ICE mandates that the a=rtcp attribute is present, even if the RTCP port
is the default one.

cheers.


["signature.asc" (application/pgp-signature)]

_______________________________________________
sr-dev mailing list
sr-dev@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-dev


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]