[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sr-dev
Subject:    [OpenSER-Devel] [Fwd: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Logging failed
From:       apidruchny () newxt ! com (Anatoly Pidruchny)
Date:       2007-08-31 13:58:40
Message-ID: 46D80407.4030904 () newxt ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Henning Westerholt wrote:
> for the return codes of the *proxy_authorize functions there is reference to 
> the *www_authorize function in the respective file present. This should be 
> sufficient, i think.
>
>   
Hello Henning,

yes, in the description of *proxy_authorize functions I found the 
sentence "For more about the negative return codes, see the above 
functions." But why is it referring to "the above functions" (plural)? 
Could/should you just change it to "For more about the negative return 
codes, see the *www_authorize function."?

Regards,
Anatoly.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]