[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sr-dev
Subject:    [Serdev] Re: rtp_proxy enhancements
From:       Maxim Sobolev <sobomax () portaone ! com>
Date:       2003-08-06 15:42:35
Message-ID: 3F3121EB.9020302 () portaone ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

jaime@umtstrial.co.uk wrote:

> By "standard" I mean something like MEGACO or MGCP.

I do not feel that something like that is really necessary, but patches 
are certainly welcome!

> Before that, a useful
> feature would be to use Internet sockets instead of Unix sockets to
> implement the communication between nathelper and rtp proxy. The idea is
> to have the rtp proxy and the SIP proxy in different machines. If that is
> done with a standard protocol, that would even be better.

The problem with making internet sockets a default is that it is much 
harder to implement security. However, having it as an option perhaps 
makes a sense, I will look into that direction, especially considering 
that it really easy to implement.

-Maxim

> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jaime
> 
> 
>>jaime@umtstrial.co.uk wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Maxim,
>>>
>>>Are you planning to develop your rtp_proxy so that it does it talks a
>>>standard protocol between the nathelper module and the rtp_proxy
>>>deamon? I think that would be a cool feature, since it would allow to
>>>distribute the system much more.
>>
>>What do you mean "standard protocol"? The protocol is in fact very
>>simple, text based, so that it would be no problem to use it with any
>>other SIP proxy.
>>
>>-Maxim
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]