[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       squid-users
Subject:    [squid-users] Re: cache_replacement_policy ==> Clarification Please & Thank You
From:       HillTopsGM <emailgregagain () gmail ! com>
Date:       2013-08-31 16:25:14
Message-ID: 1377966314494-4661871.post () n4 ! nabble ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

I sure appreciate the time you spent on this Amos! Thanks 

I thought I could maximize my chance of caching what I wanted cached  If
This Would Work
<http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cache-dir-size-v-s-available-RAM-tp4661705p4661868.html> \


Failing that, did you have an opinion as to whether or not 'heap' was better
than the 'lru' with regards to windows updates?




--
View this message in context: \
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/cache-replacement-policy-Clarification-Please-Thank-You-tp4661855p4661871.html
 Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]