[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       squid-users
Subject:    Re: [squid-users] Reverse Proxy - order of cache_peer_access rules
From:       Oskar Stolc <oskar.stolc () gmail ! com>
Date:       2011-06-28 19:28:55
Message-ID: BANLkTinwUYUKQhz372e6stCbp2or9ODpMg () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

Hi Amos,


thanks for the clarification. I've re-ordered my cache_peer rules and
all works now as expected.

Thank you,
Oskar


> Selection is based on cache_peer directive order.
>
> cache_peer_access is just a modifier to prevent particular selection choices
> being made.
>
> "server1 allow site1" permits all site1, regardless of ocode_param.
>
>
> Solution is to either add !ocode_param to each of the server1 and server2
> access allows, or move cache_peer for server3 to the top.
>
> Amos
> --
> Please be using
>  Current Stable Squid 2.7.STABLE9 or 3.1.12
>  Beta testers wanted for 3.2.0.9 and 3.1.12.3
>

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]