[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       squid-dev
Subject:    RE: one more squid-2.6 rel?
From:       "Steven Wilton" <swilton () q-net ! net ! au>
Date:       2006-09-22 6:37:32
Message-ID: 00df01c6de11$999a89d0$f9a9a8c0 () corporate ! eftel ! com
[Download RAW message or body]

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:henrik@henriknordstrom.net] 
> Sent: Thursday, 21 September 2006 4:12 PM
> To: Steven Wilton
> Cc: squid-dev@squid-cache.org
> Subject: RE: one more squid-2.6 rel?
> 
> tor 2006-09-21 klockan 07:57 +0800 skrev Steven Wilton:
> 
> > OK, here it is.  It compiles cleanly now, and worked fine 
> before I had to
> > merge it with the weight support patch that was applied 3 
> days ago.  I'm
> > going to upgrade our caches to the latest 2.6 snapshot + 
> this patch and test
> > with both hash and mask assignments.
> > 
> > If it works fine, I'll commit later today.
> 
> Looks quite fine. Still some blanks to fill in about the undocumented
> mask assignment identity fields. Maybe things will clear up 
> over time..
> 
> But squid.conf notes on wccp2_assignment_method is a little 
> confusing..
> 
> +	Currently (as of IOS 12.4) cisco routers only support 
> assignment.
> +	Cisco switches support the L2 redirect assignment method.
> 
> Think this means to read something like:
> 
> 	Currently (as of IOS 12.4) cisco routers only support 
> hash assignment
> 	and Cisco switches only support mask assignment method.
> 

Thanks, I've just comitted a patch to fix this comment.

Steven

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.7/454 - Release Date: 21/09/2006
 

[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]