[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       squid-dev
Subject:    Re: generic modules review please
From:       "Robert Collins" <robert.collins () itdomain ! com ! au>
Date:       2001-02-21 8:47:31
Message-ID: 006d01c09bec$33f31650$0200a8c0 () lifelesswks
[Download RAW message or body]

I'm considering that an increasing amount of squid will become
modularised. I expect that the existing modules will stay as modules,

I see little reason for directories for different types of modules (the
framework allows a module to register itself as appropriate - so a
"module" can have multiple functions (ie a fs that has a matching repl
policy that only applies to it)

So I'm looking at the modules as "required", and the modules directory
as the common root of every module that can be built.

Rob

----- Original Message -----
From: "Adrian Chadd" <adrian@creative.net.au>
To: "Robert Collins" <robert.collins@itdomain.com.au>
Cc: <squid-dev@squid-cache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 7:15 PM
Subject: Re: generic modules review please


>
> > Q: is it worth, or even a good idea to move all the existing
fs/repl/auth directories under "modules"
>
>
> Depends. are you looking at these modules as being "temporary" or
> "required" ?
>
>
> --
> Adrian Chadd "Romance novel?"
> <adrian@creative.net.au> "Girl Porn."
>     - http://www.sinfest.net/d/20010202.html
>


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]