[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread] 

List:       sptk
Subject:    Re: SPTK & libtar
From:       "Alexey Parshin" <alexeyp () gmail ! com>
Date:       2009-01-07 22:08:55
Message-ID: a75bc3cf0901071408x3558bf40p501cd9d5ed018c22 () mail ! gmail ! com
[Download RAW message or body]


Ok, namespace it is.

2009/1/8 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>

> I glanced through the changes. While most of them not
> too critical, they do make code cleaner (and make it compile
> on some more platforms, it seems). Upstream is dead, so no
> point in forcing ourselves to external version.
>
> Alexey Parshin wrote:
> > I was going to check my changes in libtar code - maybe I can simply use
> > libtar.. If not - then I'd just wrap it into namespace SPTK as you
> suggest.
> >
> > 2009/1/8 Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh <ilya@total-knowledge.com>
> >
> >
> >> I'm thinking, to avoid problems with included
> >> libtar, I think we could simply change it from
> >> C to C++ and put the whole thing into sptk::internal
> >> namespace. This will avoid any collisions with
> >> external libtar symbols in case SPTK ever gets linked
> >> into another app with libtar.
> >>
> >> It'll also let me silently close Gentoo bug on this
> >> subject :)
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> >> http://www.total-knowledge.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Ilya A. Volynets-Evenbakh
> http://www.total-knowledge.com
>
>


-- 
Alexey Parshin,
http://www.sptk.net


[prev in list] [next in list] [prev in thread] [next in thread]